I will have to go into further detail concerning Stefan Schoellmann seeing as he has raped my friend using his NSA agents he has control over. I will also show the connections and evidence regarding this. For him to comment on my blog at 11:29 AM (note the time, ritualistic as always) after I was told about what happened to my friend by her is not coincidence THERE IS NO SUCH THING IN THIS LUNATIC ASYLUM!
People think they can get away with raping and murdering and every sort of evil that I can't fathom. Well you can't, the light will shine on you and expose you. Any injustices committed against you will also be brought to light. We are dealing with dangerous criminals who clearly don't feel the way I do, and want to harm and rape and kill, WELL NO MORE!
YOU WILL ALL BE OUTED AND KILLED YOURSELF FOR YOUR EVIL CRIMES!!!
Stefan Schoellman is already in damage control mode but it is too late. We know what you are and what you have done. You cannot hide and will not escape from the ones you have harmed, You will not silence the innocent or the courageous.
Now Stefan Schoellmann has also been hurt and harmed in ways I do not know. I truly feel bad for that and he deserves justice against those who committed such awful crimes against him.
Half way down the page , NUMBER 214 - STEFAN A SCHOELLMANN (victim of DIRECTED ENERGY & NEUROLOGICAL WEAPONS)
Truly awful. But this is not an excuse to commit the same crimes against other people. Now the question I ask is to watch extent does he control this. We know the "truth movement" is filled with frauds and phonies taking away from the actual people being harmed.
Work
Occupation
Developer of Open Jaw Variable Protected OPSEC / SPECOPs
Skills
Writing; Business Development; Training; Teaching; Main Line Production
Tagline
ISBN & ISSN Codices Reserved for "Interview with Chiffon" ....
Put a little here to let others know you found the right People, this office intends to be forensic in its communications regardless SOPA and owns legal contract paper to attach interested person(s) to multiple discoveries "Anytown, USA" - even "Anytown, Worldwide" thanks Google+ for allowing to try this out the RIGHT WAY! Please do not assume, this office manages Valuable Paper that has interest even in Contract Construction, Film, a Diverse Portfolio of activity - try the movie Office Space! and understand that skilled basic labor is as important as any film or feature production like the PS3 OPSEC! It's NOT (only) SOFTWARE! the Majority of what you see around you was put there by other hands, Thank them that you will have a nice office to work and report to and from :) Governments spread risk on stock pools to keep you information slaves forever? - I say No! who do you work for mmm? I think we are ready to receive "Good Hands People" but key management protocols need to be established and documented "88 Minutes Good Hands People" VIP! The Sicilians are Geniuses! ; ) THIS IS ONLY THE BEGINNING PEOPLE - GREAT THINGS WILL YET HAPPEN! BUT YOU HAVE TO DO THE WORK, ok? thank you! SPECIAL NOTE PLEASE STOP STALKING THIS COMPUTER: the Operational Plan is being delivered through separate KEY SYSTEMS!
Bragging rights
Survived the War on Terra Nova - Feeling Lucky? Make my Day!
For him to mention Terra Nova is a direct link to his knowledge and manipulation of time .
It is also odd the show is about "Jim" seeing as the Green Lantern could also be a reference to me. Not to flatter myself but I have to question the insanity of these syncronicities and connections .
Below is a court case involving Schoellmann.
It is also odd the show is about "Jim" seeing as the Green Lantern could also be a reference to me. Not to flatter myself but I have to question the insanity of these syncronicities and connections .
Below is a court case involving Schoellmann.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Carl J. Barbier United States District Judge
SECTION: "J" (5)
ORDER AND REASONS
SECTION: "J" (5)
ORDER AND REASONS
Before the Court is defendant Sheriff Harry Lee's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 55.) The motion is opposed. For the following reasons the Court finds that the motion should be GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The central event triggering this suit occurred on July 28, 2004, when a psychiatrist and sheriff's deputies removed Plaintiff from his house and had him detained at East Jefferson General Hospital for ten days to receive medical treatment.
Plaintiff had a history of mental illness, had stopped taking his medicine, and had declined to come to appointments with his treating psychiatrist. The Coroner's office issued an Order of Protective Custody to have him detained. The order expired prior to his detention. Following a call from Plaintiff's treating psychiatrist expressing concern about his mental state, psychiatrist Helen Costales, accompanied by sheriff's deputies, went to Plaintiff's house, evaluated him in person, and determined that he was delusional and dangerous. She issued a Physician's Emergency Certificate based upon her direct examination. Pursuant to the Emergency Certificate, Plaintiff was taken into custody and transported to the East Jefferson General Hospital. He was diagnosed as delusional by a doctor at the hospital and he was detained there. Within 72 hours this diagnosis was confirmed by a psychiatrist from the Coroner's office. He was administered psychotropic medicines. His condition improved over the next ten days. He was released on August 6, 2004.
He has sued Jefferson Parish, the Coroner, several medical institutions, the CEO of the East General Jefferson Hospital, and the Sheriff under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating his constitutional rights. As a result of prior motions, all of the claims in the case have been dismissed except the claim that the Sheriff's deputies used excessive force in arresting plaintiff.
LEGAL STANDARD
Summary judgment is appropriate where the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (citing Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 56(c)). The moving party bears the initial burden of demonstrating to the court that there is an absence of genuine factual issues. Id. Once the moving party meets that burden, the non-moving party must go beyond the pleadings and designate facts showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact in dispute. Id. "A factual dispute is 'genuine' where a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party. If the record, taken as a whole, could not lead a rational trier of fact to find for the non-moving party, then there is no genuine issue for trial and summary judgment is proper." Weber v. Roadway Exp., Inc., 199 F.3d 270, 272 (5th Cir. 2000) (citations omitted). The non-moving party's burden "is not satisfied with 'some metaphysical doubt as to the material facts,' by 'conclusory allegations,' by 'unsubstantiated assertions,' or by only a 'scintilla' of evidence. [The courts] resolve factual controversies in favor of the nonmoving party, but only when there is an actual controversy, that is, when both parties have submitted evidence of contradictory facts. [The courts] do not, however, in the absence of any proof, assume that the nonmoving party could or would prove the necessary facts." Little, 37 F.3d 1075 (emphasis in original)(citations omitted).
DISCUSSION
"To bring a § 1983 excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment, a plaintiff must first show that [he] was seized. Next [he] must show that [he] suffered (1) an injury that (2) resulted directly and only from the use of force that was excessive to the need and that (3) the force used was objectively unreasonable." Flores v. City of Palacios, 381 F.3d 391, 396 (5th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted). As the Court has already noted, to hold Sheriff Lee, or the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, liable for the conduct of the deputies, plaintiff must show that the Sheriff knew facts sufficient to make plain a pattern of excessively injuring detainees, failed to take the obvious steps to prevent the abuse, and caused by that failure the constitutional injury to plaintiff. (Doc. 44 at 6.)
DISCUSSION
"To bring a § 1983 excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment, a plaintiff must first show that [he] was seized. Next [he] must show that [he] suffered (1) an injury that (2) resulted directly and only from the use of force that was excessive to the need and that (3) the force used was objectively unreasonable." Flores v. City of Palacios, 381 F.3d 391, 396 (5th Cir. 2004) (citations omitted). As the Court has already noted, to hold Sheriff Lee, or the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, liable for the conduct of the deputies, plaintiff must show that the Sheriff knew facts sufficient to make plain a pattern of excessively injuring detainees, failed to take the obvious steps to prevent the abuse, and caused by that failure the constitutional injury to plaintiff. (Doc. 44 at 6.)
Plaintiff has produced sufficient proof that he has an injured back. Defendant seeks judgment that there is no genuine issue of fact that the deputies caused his injuries or that the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office had a policy of using excessive force. (Doc. 55.) Plaintiff counters that his discovery requests raise genuine issues as to whether he was treated roughly, whether he sustained injury or aggravation to existing injury in connection with his arrest, and whether he was traumatized by the brandishing of tasers and by being handcuffed. (Docs. 58 and 59.)
On the issue of medical causation, plaintiff testifies that "the adrenaline, confusion, withdrawal of stun gun from holster and ensuing threats and handcuffing deportation in Jefferson Parish police car by verbal coercion and threats, gawking neighbors, etc. very likely caused my disk to slip at that precise time." (Pl's First Response to Interrogatory No. 2.) On the issue of official policy plaintiff testifies that "[t]he entire behavioral attitude and policy to use force in my case was absolutely unnecessary as I have been and continue to civilly and normally proceed in my daily work." (Pl's First Response to Interrogatory No. 7.)*fn1 Plaintiff does not indicate that any other support on these issues exists.
It is apparent that plaintiff's responses amount to no more than unsubstantiated assertions. As such, they are insufficient to raise a genuine issue for trial. No reasonable jury could find for plaintiff on the basis of plaintiff's assertions without more.
On the issue of medical causation, plaintiff testifies that "the adrenaline, confusion, withdrawal of stun gun from holster and ensuing threats and handcuffing deportation in Jefferson Parish police car by verbal coercion and threats, gawking neighbors, etc. very likely caused my disk to slip at that precise time." (Pl's First Response to Interrogatory No. 2.) On the issue of official policy plaintiff testifies that "[t]he entire behavioral attitude and policy to use force in my case was absolutely unnecessary as I have been and continue to civilly and normally proceed in my daily work." (Pl's First Response to Interrogatory No. 7.)*fn1 Plaintiff does not indicate that any other support on these issues exists.
It is apparent that plaintiff's responses amount to no more than unsubstantiated assertions. As such, they are insufficient to raise a genuine issue for trial. No reasonable jury could find for plaintiff on the basis of plaintiff's assertions without more.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that defendant Sheriff Harry Lee's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 55) is GRANTED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
And then we find he has a patent
So on the morning of November 13, 2013 NSA agents went over to Jodi Smith's residence and raped her. From what I've posted, it can be seen Schoellmann does have NSA contacts, the likes of which I am not familiar with, but can see a strategy that has been used by my enemies where they play the part of the victim, when they are in fact the aggressor.
The timing is no coincidence. Even as I type this on Sunday November 17, 2013 Jodi Smith is still be harassed and attacked by frequency weaponry.
Now my researcher friends and I have connected this family line to the Ritters. Schoellmann also had this product (hazelnuts I believe) on his page which would confirm a family connection.
I MENTION THIS BECAUSE OF LOUISIANA SENATOR DAVID VITTER! WHO IS AN ACTOR PLAYED BY NEIL BUSH AKA RICK SANTORUM!
VITTER ~ RITTER
THIS IS WHY THERE WILL BE A FAKE ASSASSINATION - FAKE DEATH INVOLVING THE SENATOR IN THE FUTURE!
NOW YOU KNOW WHAT IS ACTUALLY TRANSPIRING AND WHO CONTROLS IT!
Since Schoellmann was so kind to show a pic of the CIA as his Facebook profile picture.
If the Ritters are the Rockefellers, we have went a little further in thwarting the plans of these Saturn worshippers and their evil sick demented plans.
More investigation and facts will be revealed shortly.
May these criminals be found and destroyed!
And as for Schoellmann. Just tell the truth. Do the right thing. Stop hurting people.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3bE15UgAvc
ReplyDelete